Washington Administrative Code (Last Updated: November 23, 2016) |
Title 284. Insurance Commissioner, Office of |
Chapter 284-43. Health carriers and health plans. |
Section 284-43-5080. Prescription drug benefit design.
Latest version.
- (1) A carrier may design its prescription drug benefit to include cost control measures, including requiring preferred drug substitution in a given therapeutic class, if the restriction is for a less expensive, equally therapeutic alternative product available to treat the condition.(2) A carrier may include elements in its prescription drug benefit design that, where clinically feasible, create incentives for the use of generic drugs. Examples of permitted incentives include, but are not limited to, refusal to pay for higher cost drugs until it can be shown that a lower cost drug or medication is not effective (also known as step therapy protocols or fail-first policies), establishing a preferred brand and nonpreferred brand formulary, or otherwise limiting the benefit to the use of a generic drug in lieu of brand name drugs, subject to a substitution process as set forth in subsection (3) of this section.(3) A carrier must establish a process that a provider and enrollee may use to request a substitution for a covered prescribed therapy, drug or medication.(a) The process must not unreasonably restrict an enrollee's access to nonformulary or alternate medications for refractory conditions. Used in this context, "refractory" means "not responsive to treatment."(b) A carrier's substitution process must not result in delay in treating an enrollee's emergency fill or urgent care needs, or expedited requests for authorization. Subject to the terms and conditions of the policy that otherwise limit or exclude coverage, the carrier must permit substitution of a covered generic drug or formulary drug if:(i) An enrollee does not tolerate the covered generic or formulary drug; or(ii) An enrollee's provider determines that the covered generic or formulary drug is not therapeutically efficacious for an enrollee. A carrier may require the provider to submit specific clinical documentation as part of the substitution request; or(iii) The provider determines that a dosage is required for clinically efficacious treatment that differs from a carrier's formulary dosage limitation for the covered drug. A carrier may require the provider to submit specific clinical documentation as part of the substitution request and must review that documentation prior to making a decision.(4) A carrier may include a preauthorization requirement for its prescription drug benefit and its substitution process, based on accepted peer reviewed clinical studies, Federal Drug Administration black box warnings, the fact that the drug is available over-the-counter, objective and relevant clinical information about the enrollee's condition, specific medical necessity criteria, patient safety, or other criteria that meet an accepted, medically applicable standard of care.(a) Neither the substitution process criteria nor the type or volume of documentation required to support a substitution request may be unreasonably burdensome to the enrollee or their provider.(b) The substitution process must be administered consistently, and include a documented consultation with the prescribing provider prior to denial of a substitution request.(5) Use of a carrier's substitution process is not a grievance or appeal pursuant to RCW 48.43.530 and 48.43.535. Denial of a substitution request is an adverse benefit determination, and an enrollee, their representative provider or facility, or representative may request review of that decision using the carrier's appeal or adverse benefit determination review process.[WSR 16-01-081, recodified as § 284-43-5080, filed 12/14/15, effective 12/14/15. Statutory Authority: RCW 48.02.060, 48.02.062, 48.18.140, 48.43.525, 48.44.050, 48.44.440(2), 48.44.460(2), 48.46.200, and 48.46.510. WSR 12-21-019 (Matter No. R 2012-03), § 284-43-817, filed 10/8/12, effective 11/8/12.]