Washington Administrative Code (Last Updated: November 23, 2016) |
Title 390. Public Disclosure Commission |
Chapter 390-37. Enforcement hearing (adjudicative proceeding) rules. |
Section 390-37-142. Brief enforcement hearing (adjudicative proceeding)—Procedure.
Latest version.
- (1) A brief adjudicative proceeding may be presided over by the chair, or a member of the commission designated by the chair.(2) When a violation, as described in WAC 390-37-140, is alleged, before taking action, the executive director shall send the alleged violator notice, which shall include:(a) Alleged violation;(b) The maximum amount of the penalty that can be imposed at the hearing, relevant penalty schedules, and the amount of any proposed fine; and(c) Person's right to respond either in writing or in person to explain his/her view of the matter.(3) As provided in RCW 34.05.050, a respondent who has been notified of a brief adjudicative proceeding may waive the hearing by providing the following prior to the hearing:(a) A signed statement of understanding;(b) Any missing required reports; and(c) A penalty payment specified by the executive director in accordance with the penalty authority of WAC 390-37-140 and the brief enforcement hearing penalty schedules of this chapter.(4) As used in this section, the term "statement of understanding" means a written statement signed by the respondent that:(a) Acknowledges a violation of chapter 42.17A RCW and any relevant rules; and(b) Expresses the respondent's understanding that the commission will not hold any adjudicative proceeding concerning the violation.(5) At the time of the hearing if the presiding officer believes alleged violations are of such magnitude as to merit penalties greater than $1,000, the presiding officer shall immediately adjourn the hearing and direct the matter be scheduled for an adjudicative proceeding by the full commission.(6) At the time any unfavorable action is taken, within ten business days the presiding officer shall serve upon each party a written statement describing the violation, the reasons for the decision, the penalty imposed, and their right to request review by the commission. The executive director is authorized to sign the decision on behalf of the presiding officer.(7) The written decision of the presiding officer is an initial order. If no review is taken of the initial order, the initial order shall be the final order.[Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17A.110(1). WSR 16-01-015, § 390-37-142, filed 12/4/15, effective 1/4/16. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.370. WSR 03-22-065, § 390-37-142, filed 11/4/03, effective 12/5/03. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.390. WSR 94-05-010, § 390-37-142, filed 2/3/94, effective 3/6/94. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.370. WSR 93-15-004, § 390-37-142, filed 7/7/93, effective 8/7/93; WSR 91-16-072, § 390-37-142, filed 8/2/91, effective 9/2/91.]
RCW 42.17A.110(1). WSR 16-01-015, § 390-37-142, filed 12/4/15, effective 1/4/16. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.370. WSR 03-22-065, § 390-37-142, filed 11/4/03, effective 12/5/03. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.390. WSR 94-05-010, § 390-37-142, filed 2/3/94, effective 3/6/94. Statutory Authority: RCW 42.17.370. WSR 93-15-004, § 390-37-142, filed 7/7/93, effective 8/7/93; WSR 91-16-072, § 390-37-142, filed 8/2/91, effective 9/2/91.
Rules
390-37-140,390-37-140,