 |
Washington Administrative Code (Last Updated: November 23, 2016) |
 |
Title 173. Ecology, Department of (See Titles 197, 317, 372, and 508) |
|
Chapter 173-98. Uses and limitations of the water pollution control revolving fund. |
Section 173-98-730. Cost-effectiveness analysis for water pollution control facilities.
Latest version.
- (1) Funding will only be considered if the project is shown to be the cost-effective alternative/solution to the water pollution control problem. The cost-effective alternative is determined using a cost-effectiveness analysis.(2) A cost-effectiveness analysis must be included in the facilities plan and must include the following:(a) A comparison of the total cost, total present worth or annual equivalent costs of alternatives considered for the planning period;(b) The no action alternative; and(c) A consideration of the monetary or nonmonetary costs/benefits of each alternative, such as the environmental impact, energy impacts, growth impacts, and community priorities.(3) Facilities plans proposing design-build or design-build-operate projects must demonstrate that this approach is the cost-effective alternative for procurement.[Statutory Authority: RCW 90.48.035. WSR 07-14-096 (Order 05-16), § 173-98-730, filed 6/29/07, effective 7/30/07.]
RCW 90.48.035. WSR 07-14-096 (Order 05-16), § 173-98-730, filed 6/29/07, effective 7/30/07.